This is G o o g l e's cache of http://www.hindustantimes.com/nonfram/030801/detNAT04.asp.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.hindustantimes.com/nonfram/030801/detNAT04.asp


Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.

Arundhati, Medha dare SC to act against them - [03/08/2001] - Hindustantimes.com
As low as 25 c/m India, No Connection Fee Cards!
HT LOGO
Friday, August 3, 2001  
 Home
 City
 Nation
 Editorial
 Business
 Sports
 World
 Cartoon
 Archives
 Chat
Infotainment
 Astrowatch
 Cinema
 Persona
 Photo Gallery
Supplements
 HT City
 HT Sunday
 HT Careers
 HT Estates
 HT Horizons
 HT School Times
 HT Tech4u
 Job Ads
Member Services
Ad Links
 Call India @ 34C
 Send Flowers to  India
 Matrimonial
Others
 About Us
 Feedback
 Advertise
 Privacy Policy
 
Nation 
 

Arundhati, Medha dare SC to act against them
HT Correspondent
New Delhi August 2

CELEBRATED AUTHOR Arundhati Roy and Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar on Thursday stood by their "contemptuous" remarks in the affidavits they had filed in response to the Supreme Court's notices on a contempt petition. Roy even dared the Apex Court to proceed against her if it found her remarks "contemptuous".

Addressing a Bench comprising Justice G B Pattanaik and Justice Ruma Pal, Roy said: "I stand by my affidavit. If you find it( the affidavit) contemptuous, please proceed against me." She was responding to Justice Pattanaik's observations that some portions of her affidavit were derogatory.

Patkar took similar position through her counsel Shanti Bhushan. If the Bench thought that his client had made adverse remarks against the court, she could be sent to jail, Bhushan argued.

On April 23, the Court had taken serious note of the tenor of the affidavits and asked Additional Solicitor General Altaf Ahmed to suggest the course of action in the case.

After hearing at length counsel representing the respondents the Bench reserved its order on the contempt petition.

The petition filed by several lawyers has sought action against the respondents for allegedly raising derogatory slogans against the Supreme Court.

In December last year, Roy, Patkar, Prashant Bhushan had protested against the Supreme Court's order for the construction of the Narmada dam. They, however, denied charges that they raised slogans against the Court during the dharna outside the SC premises.

The Court, while issuing notices to them, had said if the charges were found to be false, the lawyers, who filed the petition, may also be sent to jail.


SEND RAKHI TO INDIA
 

   Others....

Print Edition>>    Front Page  |    City  |    Nation  |    Editorial  |    Sports  |    World  |    Economy  |
 
  Archive      
 
As low as 25 c/m India, No Connection Fee Cards!

Send your feedback at feedback@hindustantimes.com
Hindustan Times House, 18-20, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi 110001, India
Phone[Board]91-11-3361234
©Hindustan Times Ltd. 1997. Reproduction in any form is prohibited without prior permission. For reprinting rights, please write to us
For Online Advertisement Queries mail to sboparai@hindustantimes.com or salil@hindustantimes.com
This site is best viewed in IE5.0 and Netscape 4.72 at 800 X 600 resolution